Pascal wagers arguments on the existence of god
Refutations of pascal’s wager and the ontological argument when debating a theist about the existence of god, there are two arguments that many of them tend to rely on as last ditch efforts. Pascal’s wager pascal’s wager doesn’t claim that we have good evidence for god’s existence, so it isn’t theoretically or cognitively rational to believe in god rather, it argues, we have good practical reason to believe in god, because we stand to benefit greatly from such a belief. In this wireless philosophy video, susanna rinard (harvard university) explains pascal's wager, blaise pascal's famous argument for belief in god lifting an approach from the gambling hall.
Blaise pascal | the wager about god's existence (pensées) | philosophy core concepts a debate on the existence of god: the cosmological argument -- f c copleston vs bertrand russell. The quinque viæ (latin five ways) (sometimes called five proofs) are five logical arguments regarding the existence of god summarized by the 13th-century catholic philosopher and theologian st thomas aquinas in his book summa theologica they are. Pascal’s wager is an argument for the existence of god developed by 17th century mathematician and philosopher blaise pascal pascal’s wager is the most famous part of his collection of notes known as the pensées. [ic] the basic idea: pascal’s wager assumes key features of the god it seeks to prove the existence of for example, that god rewards belief and not non-belief for example, that god rewards belief and not non-belief.
Pascal's wager (or pascal's gambit) is the name for an idea that blaise pascal had he said that it is not possible to prove or disprove that god exists therefore, it is better to bet that god exists. Blaise pascal was a french philosopher who presented the argument in favour of belief in god, which has become known as “pascal’s wager”  pascal’s wager: pascal thought the arguments for both the existence of god were not compelling and also that the arguments against the existence of god were not compelling. Some who comment on pascal’s wager argue that there are several parts to the one wager argument while others think that there are multiple arguments within the few pages of the wager while still others argue for both views. Pascal's wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century french philosopher, mathematician and physicist blaise pascal (1623–62) it posits that humans bet with their lives that god either exists or does not. Pascal's wager, so-called because it was devised by the brilliant catholic philosopher blaise pascal (1623-1662), is an apologetics method in the form of a wager aimed at getting atheists and agnostics to consider the possibility that god exists and that there is a heaven and hell.
Pascal’s wager is the name given to an argument put forward by the french philosopher and mathematician blaise pascal in the 17th century his argument for belief in god was based not on an appeal to evidence that god exists, but rather on the idea that it is in our own interests to believe in god and it is therefore rational for us to do so. Unfortunately pascal's wager is a flawed argument because it assumes that the god that the wager is based on is the christian god it works fine if that is the case but not if it is krishna or zeus say. One of the most well known arguments for the existence of god is pascal’s wager its purpose is not to prove that god exists, but rather to persuade a skeptic of the benefits of believing in god by believing in god, pascal argues, if you gain, you gain all, if you lose, you lose nothing. Pascal’s wager pragmatic arguments and belief in god jeff jordan clarendon press xford moral objections allege that pascalian wagers, and pragmatic arguments generally, entangle one in a morally problematic situation when one thinks that the existence of god is much less likely than not. Pascal's wager, for those who are unaware, is a common argument in favor of religious belief it says you should believe in god, because if you are right, you go to heaven, and if you are wrong, you lose nothing.
Pascal wagers arguments on the existence of god
However, if one wagers for the existence of god, the consequence is far much better than wagering against the existence of god therefore, rationally, pascal suggests it is better if a person accepts that god exists rather than god does not exist. God, pascal simply ignores other deities such as allah, brahman, and so on including these possibilities in a decision matrix means that the wager no longer gives determinate advice as to what to believe. Pascal does not think that the atheist or the believer would be convinced by his argument instead, he directs the wager to the curious and unconvinced i have a choice: either first i believe god exists or second i do not believe god exists. Update: @antie pantie: pascal's wager is not an argument for the existence of god, but an argument against atheism on the basis of pleasure pascal's wager is not against atheism on the basis of pleasure.
Pascal's wager was a revolutionary apologetic device it is not an argument for the claim that god exists that sort of argument appeals to evidence, whether empirical or conceptual the wager is an argument that belief in god is pragmatically rational, that inculcating a belief in god is the action dictated by prudence to say that an action is pragmatically rational implies that it is in one. Pascal believes that we are forced to make a decision to either believe or not believe in god what does pascal think about people who accept the wager but can't bring himself to believe it pascal thinks that if someone accepts the wager but can't bring themself to beleive it that the issue lies with the person's passion. The wager at the heart of the philosophy of pascal goldmann, the famous exegesis of the thought of blaise pascal‘s wager said it is “the center of gravity of his philosophy,” and acknowledges that the famous argument should be of interest to the libertines this argument, one of the most famous from pascal’s thoughts, hides a real complexity and deserves an explanation.
Pascal’s wager, written by blaise pascal, in essence states that it is prudent to believe in god’s existence because it is the best bet even if one assumes, that god’s existence is extremely unlikely, betting on it makes sense, for its results far outweighs the results from not betting on god’s existence. Can pascal's wager for the existence of god be turned against the religious believer and used as an argument for not believing in god although such an argument has been very briefly sketched by others its details have remained undeveloped in this paper this argument is worked out in detail in. -what do you think of the argument in pascal's wager is it convincing should it prompt someone to believe in the existence of god-jl mackie presents a very powerful argument against the existence of the god of most monotheistic religions (one that is all-good and all-powerful. Pascal’s wager is an attempt to justify belief in god not with an appeal to evidence for his existence but rather with an appeal to self-interest it is in our interests to believe in the god of christianity, the argument suggests, and it is therefore rational for us to do so.